> > In general, we want to encourage the inclusion of a 
> >  TOC in all except the shortest RFCs.
> > A TOC of the appropriate density can be a 
> >  significant aid to readers.
> > Note that automatic TOC generation by your
> >  text preparation tool may produce a TOC that
> >   is too dense (and long) to be really useful.
> > If many successive TOC entries point to the same page,
> >   your TOC probably needs to be "thinned".
>  一般に、我々は最も短い RFC 以外全部でＴＯＣの包含を奨励することを望む。
> 適切な密度のＴＯＣは読者への重要な手助けであり得る。
> あなたのテキスト準備道具によっての自動的なＴＯＣ世代が本当に有用で
> あるためにあまりにも密集している（そして長い） TOC を生産するかも
> しれないことに注意を払いなさい。
> もし多くの連続したＴＯＣ参加者が同じページを指し示すなら、あなたの
> ＴＯＣは恐らく「間引かれる」必要がある。

Generally, we hope to encourage the inclusion of TOC except for
RFC that it is the shortest in total.
TOC of the appropriate density can be important help to the reader.
Pay attention to your producing (Then, it is long.) TOC to crowd too
much for an automatic TOC generation by your text preparation tool
because to be really useful.
There is probably "It is thinned out." necessity in your TOC if the
page which many TOCs, the participant, who continued it are the same
as is pointed out.


参考：2000/03/03(金)17時23分49秒